Studying engineering to produce solutions for real-world problems

Advertisements

Studying engineering to produce solutions for real-world problems. Thompho Netshivhera, a junior mechanical engineer at Hatch, shares how his undergraduate experience helped him find his dream career in Times Higher Education.

.

 

Studying engineering to produce solutions for real-world problems

Thompho Netshivhera, a junior mechanical engineer at Hatch, shares how his undergraduate experience helped him find his dream career

Studying engineering to produce solutions for real-world problemsThompho Netshivhera's avatar

Thompho Netshivhera, Junior mechanical engineer at Hatch

March 27 2024

 

I’m originally from rural Limpopo in South Africa where there weren’t many opportunities but there were many challenges.

I did my undergraduate degree at the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in Johannesburg. Because English was not my first language, this was quite the challenge. The unwavering support from the university’s dedicated staff and my active engagement in student societies such as Maitazwitoma, the Venda-speaking (my home language) society, were crucial in shaping my university experience. 

These experiences not only helped me overcome initial apprehensions but showed me how important the university environment is in fostering growth and success. Through my active involvement in clubs and societies at Wits, I honed my leadership skills and advocated for initiatives addressing mental wellness and gender equality in engineering.

Driven by my desire to make an impact, I focused my final year honours project on addressing sewage pollution in my hometown, motivated by the stark reality of sewage spills that plague my community. Collaborating closely with my supervisor, Dr Lara MacLucas, we started to develop a dispatchable hydro turbine – a green solution aimed at both sewage treatment and electricity generation. This project not only exemplified the potential of engineering innovation but underscored the importance of community-centric solutions.

I then decided to submit this research project to the Global Undergraduate Awards. I attended the Global Undergraduate Summit in Ireland in November 2023 as a global winner in engineering. This opened doors to an international network of like-minded individuals. This platform not only recognised my work, but provided me with the opportunity to understand my potential. 


Best universities for engineering degrees 2024
What can you do with an electrical engineering degree?
What can you do with an aerospace engineering degree?


This experience was just the beginning. It led to significant recognition back at Wits, where I was presented with the special Dean’s Award by Professor Thokozani Majozi, dean of engineering and the built environment at the University of the Witwatersrand.

These experiences offered amazing details to include in my CV and, most importantly, introduced me to a network of colleagues and role models.

I am now embarking on my role as a junior mechanical engineer at Hatch, a global company spanning more than 150 countries. It’s an honour to be part of an international team that continually pushes boundaries, seeking innovative solutions. 

To the young high school students, new university entrants and graduates, I urge you to never give up. Embrace new opportunities, enter competitions and attend events that empower you. 

Never stop dreaming and always aim to improve yourself. Remember to ask: “What else is possible?” after achieving your goals or facing setbacks. It’s in picking ourselves up and trying again that we find true resilience and growth.

.

.


.

.

 

305 Crown St. to be renovated to the MENA cultural space

Advertisements

The new cultural space for Middle Eastern and North African, or MENA, students will be located at 305 Crown St., Dean of Yale College Pericles Lewis confirmed to the News. So let us get to know what 305 Crown St. to be renovated to the MENA cultural space.

The above image is for illustration and is of Harvard University Photo Tour.

.


305 Crown St. to be renovated to Middle Eastern and North African cultural space

Administrators confirmed that the new “cultural suite” will be located on the first floor of a building on Crown Street, which is set to undergo renovations over the summer.

Collyn Robinson, Multimedia Managing Editor

 

 

 

The new cultural space for Middle Eastern and North African, or MENA, students will be located at 305 Crown St., Dean of Yale College Pericles Lewis confirmed to the News.

Director of the Asian American Cultural Center Joliana Yee wrote that she and assistant director Sheraz Iqbal toured 305 Crown St. earlier this semester, along with the lead architect, to see the future home of the newly-announced MENA space. The “cultural suite” will be built over the summer on half of the first floor, according to Yee, who added that she arranged for a workshop on Friday, March 1 to solicit input from MENA students.

The lack of a MENA cultural center has long been a source of student frustration, with the new space coming after nearly six years of student organizing.The Asian American Cultural Center currently has a dedicated room for MENA students on its third floor, and, this year, the AACC sponsored the University’s first AACC-MENA peer liaisons.

“It is my goal to remain in communication with the architect and design team to ensure that the renovated space meets the needs and expectations of the MENA community within the parameters that have been approved by the University,” wrote Yee, who also an assistant dean of the College.

The latest development comes after University President Peter Salovey promised the creation of a “more plentiful and fully dedicated space” for MENA students in December. Salovey’s commitment was part of a larger message on the University’s actions to “enhance support” for students in the wake of Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza, including permanent security at the Joseph Slifka Center for Jewish Life at Yale and the hiring of a second Muslim chaplain.

“In recent years, university leaders have discussed with MENA students their requests for additional space and recognition, and we are committed to work with them and to provide resources and guidance,” Salovey wrote in his “Against Hatred” message.

In January, administrators told the News that the new MENA center would have its own dedicated peer liaisons, assistant director and physical space — distinct from the AACC — by the fall 2024 semester.

Yale added a job posting on LinkedIn for assistant director of the “MENA Cultural Community” on Jan. 18. Responsibilities include liaising with facilities staff to maintain the current MENA space in the AACC and “provide guidance throughout the build out of the new space in 305 Crown,” and to work with the AACC director in “strategic planning, financial management, program assessment, and departmental reporting.”

Lewis told the News in February that the MENA space will have a separate budget from the AACC with “substantial funding.” He said that the YCDO will use a survey to find out how many students would be engaged with the MENA center because the U.S. Census Bureau, which the Common Application uses, does not include a category for Middle Eastern and North African identity.

“In the case of some races, we get [racial demographic] information after students have been admitted from the Common App, but I think with MENA, because it’s a complex category and not exactly one of the categories in the census, we have to just ask people,” Lewis said.

Although the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action last summer, the University can still use self-reported racial identity data gathered after the application process.

Last April, University administration ordered student groups to vacate their previously assigned spaces at 305 Crown St. by the end of the year, citing “inequities” with the building hosting only 15 student groups out of hundreds on campus. At the time, Dean of Student Affairs Hannah Peck wrote to the groups that instead, each would receive a shelf in the 305 Crown storage room.

This year, the Yale Herald and the Yale Record both have offices on the third floor of the building, and First Year Outdoor Orientation Trips — one of the Camp Yale orientation programs — also uses rooms on the first and second floors for storage.

TRISTAN HERNANDEZ  

Tristan Hernandez covers student policy and affairs for the News. He is also a copy editor and previously reported on student life. Originally from Austin, Texas, he is a sophomore in Pierson College majoring in political science.

The importance of innovation and intellectual property for the construction industry

Advertisements

In the process of building a sustainable future, the importance of innovation and intellectual property for the construction industry is according to HGF Ltd – Jennifer Unsworth of paramount importance.  Why?  Let us see.

 

.



Building a sustainable future: the importance of innovation and intellectual property for the construction industry

United Kingdom March 8 2024
.

.

Like many industries, the construction industry faces huge challenges as it works toward achieving the ambitious target of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Whilst already adhering to stringent environmental standards to minimise its ecological impact, construction activities still contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, energy consumption, as well as the depletion of natural resources. The construction sector is particularly well-known for its contribution to global carbon emissions, both directly from construction processes and indirectly through the production and transportation of materials.

Organisations in the construction sector are working hard to develop innovative technologies, including modular construction and sustainable materials, in an attempt to meet evolving environmental standards and to reduce the ecological impact of construction projects.

Sustainable materials encompass a wide array of products, ranging from recycled aggregates and reclaimed wood to innovative biodegradable composites and low-carbon concrete. These materials offer not only environmental benefits but also opportunities for differentiation and innovation within the competitive construction sector.

The role of intellectual property rights (IP rights) in shaping the use and development of sustainable materials by and for the construction industry cannot be overstated.

Protecting one’s own IP rights is essential for protecting investments in research and development. Whether it be a novel construction technique, a proprietary blend of eco-friendly materials, or a unique design solution, securing patents, registered designs and trademarks can provide a competitive advantage, mitigate the risk of imitation by competitors, as well as help attract investment and development partners.

Understanding the IP landscape is also important for companies seeking to leverage sustainable materials in their projects. IP due diligence, conducted with the support of IP firms, will enable construction organisations to identify existing technologies and designs. Awareness of competitors’ patents, registered designs, trademarks, and other IP rights can inform strategic decisions and reduce infringement risks for businesses.

There is no doubt that IP also plays a pivotal role in facilitating collaborations and partnerships within the construction ecosystem. By licensing protected technologies or entering into joint ventures, companies can access cutting-edge sustainable materials developed by others, accelerating their adoption and integration into projects.

Collaborative efforts between industry players, policymakers, as well as IP experts, are essential to navigate this evolving landscape and unlock the full potential of sustainable materials in construction.

Ultimately, sustainable materials represent a promising avenue for driving positive change in the construction industry. However, the effective use and development of these technologies requires a solid understanding of IP rights. By staying informed about competitors’ IP rights, protecting their innovations, and embracing responsible collaboration, organisations in the construction industry can position themselves for success in a sustainable future.

HGF Ltd – Jennifer Unsworth

.


.

 

Power to the People: An Overview of Community Energy

Advertisements

People throughout the world are increasingly aware of all problematics tied with the energy, its source and adequate utilisation, benefits for doing so and obstacles, and way forward for grassroots efforts to implement the renewable energy transition. So, it’s like Power to the People: an Overview of Community Energy. Let us spread the word further, if you please.

.


Power to the People: An Overview of Community Energy

FEB 2ND 2024
Worldwide, citizen-led renewable energy initiatives are paving the way towards a just transition and resilient energy systems. This article provides an overview of community energy, outlining the benefits, obstacles, and way forward for grassroots efforts to implement the renewable energy transition. The renewable energy transition calls to mind sprawling solar arrays, offshore wind farms, and policymakers setting net-zero targets at global conferences. Nevertheless, a less-known yet equally important approach to a clean energy future exists.Community energy – also referred to as “local energy communities” or “renewable energy communities” – refers to locally based, small-scale renewable energy projects that are set up, owned by, and in service of different types of communities, from neighborhoods and cooperatives to nonprofits and small businesses.

Worldwide, advocates of these projects work for a renewable energy transition powered by people – where citizens invest in locally based, collectively owned renewable energy projects such as rooftop solar, local wind turbines and hydropower plants. Energy produced by these projects can be used to power everything from homes and schools to businesses and public buildings.

Projects vary in how they function, who they serve, and their relationship to main electricity grids. But by enabling people to be both energy producers and consumers – or “prosumers” – community energy has the potential to accelerate a just transition and create resilient energy systems.

An Introduction

The concept of community-led energy projects is not new – in the 19th and early 20th centuries, energy cooperatives in the US and Europe electrified rural areas. Community energy projects for the renewable energy transition, however, are a recent phenomenon.

Europe’s early efforts to transition to renewable energy in the 1980s were driven by community-owned wind farms, notably in Germany and Denmark. Initiatives increased with environmental awareness. A 2023 study revealed a rise in community energy in Europe over the past two decades in line with “collective action for the low carbon transition.” As of 2020-21, there were around 2 million people involved in 23,000 community energy projects across 30 European countries.

The European Union (EU) sees it as a key part of Europe’s energy future. In 2019 an EU directive defined and enabled “citizen energy communities”, while a 2020 report by the European Commission anticipates that 45% of Europe’s renewable energy will be community-owned by 2050.

While Europe leads the community energy revolution, examples of citizen-led renewable energy projects can be found across the world; from Revolu Solar, a non-profit installing community-owned solar in Brazil’s favelas, to the Barr River Hydro Scheme, which delivers 100% community-owned hydropower to 1,000 homes in Scotland.

Development of community energy initiatives in Europe from 1900-2020. Image: Schwanitz, V.J., Wierling, A., Arghandeh Paudler, H. et al./Scientific Reports (2023).

Working for a Just Transition

From enforced blackouts and runaway energy bills to wildfires and explosions caused by faulty transmission lines – global energy markets and the utility-led energy model have historically prioritised profit over people. Community energy offers an alternative energy system that serves and supports citizens in the transition to renewables.

As community-owned energy projects are protected from volatile global energy markets, prosumers are not held to market prices and can receive lower energy bills. During the recent Europe-wide energy crisis, it was reported that some European community energy users paid half the amount in energy bills as customers who received their electricity from commercial utilities.

And many projects choose to reinvest their profits back into the communities they serve, creating a regenerative energy economy. For example, UK-based organisation Energy Garden uses revenue from their community-owned solar projects in London to run environmental internships and youth education programmes.

Community energy organisations serve as powerful community advocates when corporation-led renewable energy projects come into a neighbourhood. The community organisation UPROSE established the first cooperatively owned solar project in New York City, Sunset Park Solar. As the Norwegian energy company Equinor sites an offshore wind facility near Sunset Park, UPROSE is working to ensure the community is not left behind and has a stake in the future renewable energy economy through providing education and jobs training in offshore wind.

Projects can also be a tool to encourage local support for the energy transition. A report by the Institute for Local Self-Reliance references a 2011 study that found “45% of residents of a German town home to community-owned wind turbines had a positive opinion of future local wind development, compared to only 16% in another town with a wind project owned largely by outside entities.”

By fostering citizen support, community energy accelerates the switch to renewables while paving the way toward an energy future that everyone is on board with.

Resilient Energy Systems 

These community-led projects offer a solution to one of the biggest roadblocks on the path to net-zero – electricity grids.

Last year, an analysis by the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that global electricity grids are in urgent need of upgrades to support the transition. According to the study, 80 million kilometres of electricity grids will need to be added or refurbished by 2040 – the equivalent of doubling the global grid. This will be a long and costly process with investments in grid infrastructure required to double to more than US$600 billion a year.

More on the topic: Current World Electricity Grids Too Weak to Sustain Energy Transition, IEA Warns

Many citizen-led energy projects operate on decentralised, local energy generation models that do not require vast networks of transmission lines. Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) such as rooftop solar allow citizens to generate energy near the site of use. Multiple DERs can be aggregated to form a community microgrid, which can operate in “island mode”, enabling communities to access renewable energy without the need to wait for grid upgrades.

An additional benefit of community-based energy generation is a safer and more reliable energy system. Adding more local, decentralised projects into the mix takes pressure off electricity grids, helping to prevent power outages, wildfires, and other challenges faced by overloaded grids.

Lastly, community energy can provide an alternative source of power when disaster strikes.

When Puerto Rico was hit by Hurricane Maria in 2017 and Hurricane Fiona in 2022, the electricity grid failed, leaving millions without power. But a few homes and businesses in the Castañer region were able to keep their lights on, powered by a micro-grid set up by The Cooperativa Hidroeléctrica de la Montaña, Puerto Rico’s first renewable energy cooperative.

Following the devastating hurricanes, Puerto Ricans began working to bring more decentralised, community-owned energy into the mix. Last year, Adjuntas, a town in the mountains of Puerto Rico, completed a cooperatively-owned solar microgrid with the capacity to power the community of 17,600 – an example of how these projects can be a powerful tool for creating both resilient communities and energy systems.

Obstacles to Community Energy

Despite the benefits these initiatives are showing in the transition to renewables, many obstacles stand in the way.

Worldwide, government approaches to the energy transition prioritise the build-out of utility-scale renewable energy projects. But support of community energy does not always translate into action.

For instance, while the UK’s Net Zero Strategy outlines the benefits of these projects, the organisation Community Energy England criticised the strategy for failing to provide practical measures supporting citizen-led renewable energy initiatives.

In an energy market dominated by corporations working on a top-down, centralised energy system, community energy projects also struggle with everything from accessing finance to invest in initiatives, to navigating the complex legal and bureaucratic processes involved in setting up projects and connecting them to the grid.

Even Europe’s energy market has become less favourable to such projects in recent years, with the removal of policies and subsidies incentivising them.

A 2020 report by Trade Unions for Energy Democracy found that the end of the Feed-in Tariff (FiT) subsidy has led community energy projects across Europe into “a pattern of decline.”

What’s more, these projects can face direct opposition from utilities seeking to protect their profit and dominant position in the market. Recent plans for a community solar program in California, a leader in solar in the US, have been opposed by the state’s three main energy utilities. Activists say this is just the most recent development in a decade-long campaign waged by utilities to block community energy in the state.

Community energy also faces social obstacles. Most people encounter energy as a service delivered by utilities, rather than something they are actively involved in, and awareness of community energy schemes is generally low. For example, a 2023 poll commissioned by the Bristol Energy Cooperative found that only 1% of respondents feel well informed on community energy. For these projects to play an impactful role in the energy transition, there needs to be more education and awareness so people can identify and set up initiatives to bring local, renewable energy into their communities.

Towards Energy Democracy

Energy Democracy, a grassroots movement working for equitable, community owned energy to play a central role in the transition, has emerged as a response to these obstacles.

The Climate Justice Alliance defines the movement’s goal as a “shift from the corporate, centralised fossil fuel economy to one that is governed by communities, is designed on the principle of no harm to the environment, supports local economies, and contributes to the health and well-being for all peoples.”

Energy Democracy activists work toward this goal through advocating for policy enabling citizen-owned renewable energy and have so far achieved some impressive wins.

The California Environmental Justice Alliance, a coalition of grassroots organisations working for Energy Democracy, set up the Solar on Multifamily Affordable Housing Program, which provides up to US$1 billion for rooftop solar on low-income households in the state. Similarly, the UK Energy Democracy campaign group Power for People successfully lobbied for a £10 million (US$12.7 million) fund to set up community energy projects across the country.

The Energy Democracy movement also works to increase awareness about these projects. In 2022, the Energy Democracy Project, more than 30 Energy Democracy organisations across the US launched the Reimagined Energy For Our Communities (REFOCUS) campaign to share stories of everyday citizens taking control of their energy systems. By showing the possibilities of citizen-led energy initiatives, the REFOCUS campaign empowers communities to take the energy transition into their own hands.

Conclusion

The ways in which the energy transition impacts people are increasingly being recognised. A chapter of the IEA’s World Energy Outlook 2023 report was dedicated to “[s]ecure and people-centred energy transitions”, addressing the need for energy access, affordability, and employment in the transition to renewables.

As the social challenges associated with energy transition are considered, community energy must stay part of the conversation and recognised for the solutions it provides. Despite the manifold obstacles these projects face, there are also encouraging signs – last year, the IEA hosted a webinar with global leaders in the community energy space and published an article outlining its benefits.

To harness these benefits, governments and markets need to support and facilitate community energy initiatives and organisations through policy and investment. Simultaneously, society needs to recognise and amplify the voices and actions of Energy Democracy activists and similar movements to bring about a clean and equitable energy future.

 You might also like: Achieving Net Zero: Where Are We Today?

The Role We Play in Earthquake Preparedness

Advertisements

Earthquake and Wind Programs Branch Civil Engineer Pataya Scott, PhD shares more about the work FEMA does to improve building codes and standards.  The Role We (FEMA) Play in Earthquake Preparedness is inspiringly here for all those in the MENA region concerned by a possible repeat of the same recent disastrous events.

.


 

The Role We Play in Earthquake Preparedness

 

.

After the devastating earthquakes in Turkey and Syria last month, you may have wondered: in a similar event, what would have happened to buildings in the United States?

For more than 40 years, FEMA has worked with our partners to improve building codes and standards, as well as advance their adoption and enforcement across the nation. While these improvements are significant, there are still older buildings in our country that are at risk of collapse during an earthquake.

More work is needed to avoid the kind of regional disaster Turkey and Syria are experiencing after the magnitude 7.8 and 7.5 earthquakes. Many existing buildings in the United States are likely to perform poorly in earthquakes because they are built to outdated standards or, in some cases, no standards at all. These buildings remain vulnerable to collapse in seismic regions like Alaska, the Pacific Northwest, California, Hawaii, the Rocky Mountains, the New Madrid region, South Carolina, the Eastern United States, Puerto Rico and Oklahoma.

To explore how these areas would be affected during a major earthquake event, you can use FEMA’s Hazus Loss Library. This tool demonstrates the cost of life and severity of damage that would happen in earthquake events similar to those in Turkey and Syria. While the numbers presented in these scenarios might be less than what those regions endured, they still represent a significant risk and enforce the need for the nation to improve its built environment.

Modern codes and standards are only effective if they are properly enforced. Turkey is known for having a current building code, similar to many parts of the United States, but implementation has historically been an issue. Regional differences in code adoption and enforcement mean that some communities may not benefit from the protection offered by stronger codes. Ongoing advocacy for both code adoption and enforcement is still needed.

FEMA is always focused on improvements. We look at the latest lessons-learned information, new science and technology. We also collaborate with many government sectors to address and mitigate a community’s risk with existing buildings. This work includes improved methods for risk assessment, prioritization and retrofit, as well as support for developing and adopting effective mitigation policies and practices, which could include replacing with new buildings.

New attention on post-disaster response and recovery has suggested that emphasis on building collapse prevention may not be enough. Disaster-resilient communities need buildings that can be occupied following a hazard event and provide functions and services necessary for meeting essential community needs and maintaining economic vitality. This means buildings that not only stand strong after an earthquake but still allow residents to safely use things like running water and electricity.

FEMA’s National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program is focused on activities that support improved community resilience. Those efforts are outlined in a recent report to Congress (NIST-FEMA Special Publication FEMA P-2090/NIST SP-1254, Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time) and are only just beginning.

There are many actions you can take on a personal level to improve your own community’s earthquake resilience.

  • Practice Safety Drills. Since earthquakes can happen without notice or warning, be prepared by practicing Drop, Cover, and Hold On with family and coworkers.
  • Make an Emergency Plan. Create a family emergency communications plan that has an out-of-state contact. Plan where to meet if you get separated. Make a supply kit that includes enough non-perishable food, water and medications for several days, a flashlight, a fire extinguisher and a whistle. Prepare for pets and service animals, too.
  • Protect Your Home. Secure heavy items in your home like bookcases, refrigerators, water heaters, televisions and objects that hang on walls. Also consider obtaining an earthquake insurance policy since a standard homeowner’s insurance policy does not cover earthquake damage.
  • Receive emergency alerts and warnings by downloading the recently updated FEMA App.
  • Visit Ready.gov or Listo.gov today and practice making an earthquake plan with your families.

For more information on how to protect your community from earthquakes, visit www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/risk-management/earthquake.

.
.
.